providing parents with the truth about the public education system
Cheating in Class

The Costs of Closed Schools

The following story is from the Oregonian archives:

District aims wrecking ball at Whitaker
History – The school board OKs borrowing $2.1 million to raze what’s become an eyesore
Thursday, August 24, 2006
PAIGE PARKER

Vandals inspired by Whitaker Middle School’s vacant, dimly lit hulk have made a mess out of a building already burdened with one of Portland’s messiest pasts.  This week, the Portland School Board pledged again to clean it up, giving district officials the go-ahead to borrow $2.1 million to raze the building.

Wrecking crews could begin knocking down the Northeast Portland school in early November, said Kerry Hampton, the district’s property manager. It could take as long as three months to completely clear the site, he said.

Marcia Taylor, who has lived across the street from the school since 1974, says she’ll be relieved to be rid of the building. Three of her children attended the school when it was Adams High School.

“It’s just really been a shame,” Taylor said. “It was just a beautiful school when it was built.”

Students haven’t attended the school since district leaders closed it in 2001. Whitaker was built in 1966 with windows that didn’t open, a flaw that contributed to the buildup of radon. A leaky roof and lack of ventilation encouraged the growth of toxic mold, and a host of other structural problems made the 268,899-square-foot building too costly to repair.

And though the community uses the adjacent track and grounds, the school itself is riddled with graffiti and garbage, and boards cover most of the windows.

Whitaker neighborhood students now attend Tubman Middle School, a seven-mile haul across the city by bus. Apart from the toll that traveling takes on students, leaving the school vacant has cost taxpayers. Since 2002, the district has spent just shy of $700,000 in maintenance, utilities and insurance for the empty building.

The district will borrow the demolition money, Hampton said, because interest on the loan will cost as much or less than the district now spends maintaining the building. After the building is gone, the district intends to sell the southern 5.8 acres of the approximately 10-acre site to a residential developer. Hampton estimates that the land will bring in at least enough to repay the loan, with as much as $787,000 left over.

But construction of a replacement school, which former Superintendent Jim Scherzinger promised five years ago, will have to wait. Portland Public Schools’ construction bond expired in 2005, and the district doesn’t have money to replace the school.

The school board passed a resolution in 2005 that sets aside half of the proceeds from the future sale of Washington High School for capital improvements at the Whitaker site. With an elementary school costing between $12 million and $15 million, and a middle school ranging from $18 million to $23 million, the district must raise much more to replace Whitaker.

Michelle Ovando, chairwoman of the Concordia Neighborhood Association, said neighbors hope the district sells to developers who will build affordable homes that fit in with the neighborhood.

“We’re anxious to get that school brought down. It draws in gang activity and drug activity,” Ovando said. “It’s a big building and easy to hide behind.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Sphinn
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • RSS
  • Add to favorites
  • Faves
  • email
  • Blogplay
  • Print
  • Twitter

3 comments

1 HotCorner { 06.18.10 at 10:34 am }

I’m curious if anybody has calculated the cost of shutting down the Marshall building, and moving all of the programs to other campuses.

This building has been modernized to accomodate not only 10+ computer labs on campus, but also a completely wireless network across the entire building. It’s a costly process that would have to happen from scratch at any other building in the District.

I’m curious if other buildings even have space for computer labs (let alone space for the additional classrooms) that would have to be utilized in the event of a campus closure. I’d hate to see us close a building mid-summer, only to be scrambling to find ugly portables haphazardly parked in parking lots of various schools; let alone discovering that the thousands of dollars worth of computer equipment obtained by BizTech High School through grants was completely unusuable due to a lack of space or technological capabilities at the new schools.

2 Zarwen { 06.18.10 at 4:24 pm }

“. . . scrambling to find ugly portables haphazardly parked in parking lots of various schools. . . .”

Let’s not forget that the School Board approved $11.2 MILLION for “ugly portables” last December; dare I suggest that should be the first allocation on the chopping block to help balance the budget???

3 moonbaby { 06.20.10 at 2:42 pm }

I still would like to find out about any class action law suits regarding the radon. My program was housed there for 4 years. cough , sputter, cough

Leave a Comment


Website Builder