Comments on: Marshall’s Future http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/ providing parents with the truth about the public education system Sat, 07 Jan 2012 20:07:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: George http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1034 George Thu, 24 Jun 2010 23:13:30 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1034 I know all the kids I have talked to are very excited about their new coach! We are looking forward to a great new season. I know all the kids I have talked to are very excited about their new coach! We are looking forward to a great new season.

]]> By: GOOD NEWS! http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1030 GOOD NEWS! Thu, 24 Jun 2010 04:33:44 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1030 Hey everyone, here's some good news...a new football coach for Marshall! Everyone's super excited and the team's gonna be good this year! http://highschoolsports.oregonlive.com/news/article/-4031526293785215974/new-marshall-football-coach-excited-to-move-forward-despite-schools-cloudy-future/ Hey everyone, here’s some good news…a new football coach for Marshall! Everyone’s super excited and the team’s gonna be good this year!

http://highschoolsports.oregonlive.com/news/article/-4031526293785215974/new-marshall-football-coach-excited-to-move-forward-despite-schools-cloudy-future/

]]> By: Carrie Adams http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1029 Carrie Adams Thu, 24 Jun 2010 00:59:49 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1029 Steve, I think there were a few factors in my favor including that Steve Goldschmidt's firing was high profile and lawyers were already involved. I was assured by one of the district's lawyers prior to arbitration that there wouldn't be any retaliation. Steve, I think there were a few factors in my favor including that Steve Goldschmidt’s firing was high profile and lawyers were already involved. I was assured by one of the district’s lawyers prior to arbitration that there wouldn’t be any retaliation.

]]> By: steve http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1028 steve Wed, 23 Jun 2010 20:15:05 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1028 Wow, did you have any recourse? Stacey Sibley complained about safety at Pioneer and concern for student and staff safety, she then went to HR and complained about Joanne Mabbott , then she was demoted. It cost tons more money after she left Pioneer and Joanne hired another friend and then some to try and replace her. Wow, did you have any recourse? Stacey Sibley complained about safety at Pioneer and concern for student and staff safety, she then went to HR and complained about Joanne Mabbott , then she was demoted. It cost tons more money after she left Pioneer and Joanne hired another friend and then some to try and replace her.

]]> By: Carrie Adams http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1027 Carrie Adams Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:27:00 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1027 Steve, I saw the WW story on the SPED administrator. I don't know that particular story but I know my PPS HR position was cut when I complained about discrimination, unsafe hiring practices and a hostile work environment under Steve Goldschmidt's leadership. The cut took place shortly after I agreed to cooperate in arbitration over Goldschmidt's firing. I complained about the retaliation and they found another job for me. Steve, I saw the WW story on the SPED administrator. I don’t know that particular story but I know my PPS HR position was cut when I complained about discrimination, unsafe hiring practices and a hostile work environment under Steve Goldschmidt’s leadership. The cut took place shortly after I agreed to cooperate in arbitration over Goldschmidt’s firing. I complained about the retaliation and they found another job for me.

]]> By: steve http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1026 steve Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:16:24 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1026 Carrie did you see article on willamette week regarding special ed. administrator files law suit? Any comments or thoughts? Carrie did you see article on willamette week regarding special ed. administrator files law suit? Any comments or thoughts?

]]> By: Steve Buel http://cheatinginclass.com/2010/06/marshalls-future/comment-page-1/#comment-1025 Steve Buel Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:15:58 +0000 http://cheatinginclass.com/?p=2328#comment-1025 One thing that has not taken place at Marshall or Jefferson is the district setting up a committee of dissidents to discuss proposals with the administration (and board members). It is really hard to evaluate what you are doing if there is no honest, unfettered feedback on your ideas. The board doesn't get it from the administration and the administration doesn't get it from their assistants. It just can't be one way communication like the entire redesign process has been (the board to the public, then the public to the board, no back and forth). You need give and take discussions where responses can be challenged. But with this board and really the administration they seem afraid of real discussions. Too bad, they are bright people who could benefit greatly from real conversations. Hence, they need to set up purposely dissident committees which truly represent the communities affected before they can arrive at serious and fair steps in solving the problems raised during the redesign process. So PPS will stumble along some more hoping to get lucky instead of creating real solutions that have a chance of working. One thing that has not taken place at Marshall or Jefferson is the district setting up a committee of dissidents to discuss proposals with the administration (and board members). It is really hard to evaluate what you are doing if there is no honest, unfettered feedback on your ideas. The board doesn’t get it from the administration and the administration doesn’t get it from their assistants. It just can’t be one way communication like the entire redesign process has been (the board to the public, then the public to the board, no back and forth). You need give and take discussions where responses can be challenged. But with this board and really the administration they seem afraid of real discussions. Too bad, they are bright people who could benefit greatly from real conversations. Hence, they need to set up purposely dissident committees which truly represent the communities affected before they can arrive at serious and fair steps in solving the problems raised during the redesign process. So PPS will stumble along some more hoping to get lucky instead of creating real solutions that have a chance of working.

]]>