Letter to the Board From a Marshall Parent
Dear Members of the Board of Education,
Prior to April 26th, as a parent, I concentrated on advocating for the 3 small schools on the Marshall campus to stay open and educating people about the stigma we have to overcome as a school and community. My testimony and that of my 9th grade daughter were delivered with these points in mind, mainly concentrated on RA2 since that was where our ‘expertise’ was rooted.
Since April 26th we’ve had the amazing opportunity to connect with parents, students and community members of the Lents neighborhood. My hope was to understand the people most affected by these proposals and become a better advocate. My main goal was to get the students involved. I had hoped for teacher feedback. After all, this is their community being uprooted and it’s their world that PPS is changing. Again.
I am not sure if I have succeeded in my goals, but I am writing to share with you what I have learned. It is clear to me that parents, students and community members are absolutely in favor of receiving the equity that has been promised to all the other schools. Even many students, who treasure their small schools, seem to support a comprehensive model out of a desire for more offerings but also out of fairness to their peers who would lose their school. No one I have spoken to wants to see Marshall so limited. In a 2 day Marshall student survey that gathered approx. 275 responses, only 6% chose the focus-option (2 Administrators are included in the 6%). It is widely believed that this focus-option will weaken the community, increase commute times by almost double for students that would land in Franklin or Madison, increase drop-out rates among already at-risk students and will starve off athletics by decreasing the student body. Not one person I have spoken to seems to agree with decreasing Marshall’s population. The common message I have heard is “Increase Marshall”.
So, if the only option for this neighborhood with the largest catchment in the district, for this campus and its current 750+ students is to turn it into an undefined focus option with an undefined core program where only 400-500 students apply to attend, based on a virtually non-existent leasing conversation with another school district, I say no thank you. Can you blame me? Can you blame anyone? It is too limiting and not equitable for this neighborhood. It’s totally undefined. It does not appear to be secure or sustainable. And even more importantly, I don’t understand dismissing several hundred students and a real chance at building bridges with the Lents community to help improve public perception about Marshall and celebrate its successes to increase the benefit of existing programs.
I do understand the main point Superintendent Smith took from the Marshall students was their relationships with teachers. So why limit this effective way of learning to just 400-500 students? Robb Cowie, during a meeting at Marshall on May 20th, suggested attendance didn’t have to be capped at 500. What exactly does that mean? Would attendance be capped at 750? 1200? 1600? It would be thrilling to have those teacher relationships in every school. If it’s the “relational” aspect that makes Marshall so successful, why not implement this district-wide for everyone? I am positive the beloved test scores would be through the roof, everywhere, closing the gap for sure. Let’s make Marshall another pillar of education by closing the boundaries and allowing all of our students this powerful method of teaching along with the educational equity that the Superintendent is demanding to provide.
Demand that your vote is further informed by putting in some time at Marshall and fully understand the neighborhood you are about to drastically affect. Allow your perceptions to change. Spend a day on campus with one of our student representatives. Come to our community meeting next Thursday. As elected Board of Education members I hope you would take every opportunity to learn about this neighborhood and its complexities and not just spending a moment or two to hear “yes we love our teacher relationships” but to also hear “we want more electives” or “this community deserves better” or “leave our school alone”.
It is not Marshall’s burden to carry to make sure PPS helps other good schools get even better. It upsets me that when Marshall challenges and dares to ask for a piece of the equity pie, it seems that responsibility is somehow put on Marshall to buck up and take it so everyone else can benefit. Our 750+ students are not sacrificial lambs, yet we are reminded of the impact “we” would have on other schools by staying fully open. We? This is not OUR proposal. That kind of “reminder” seems similar to blaming the victim. When our students protest, should we start reminding them that they are responsible for making sure other students do better and have more? That somehow, they owe it to the others? That they need not complain about passing their former, closer high school on their way to their newly assigned high school via an extended commute, time for a babysitter, cut hours at work, less time for homework, impossible athletic schedule, because students all over the district might be able to receive a few extra classes?
Finally, if it’s solely up to us as parents and community leaders in any PPS school to create effective communication and education about your process, if PPS representatives are booked to the hilt with meetings, design meetings are being scheduled within and parallel to the 30 day “public input” period, it’s clear that WE ALL NEED MORE TIME. Please extend the public input period and delay your vote. Allow our communities, and others like ours that struggle, to unite and thoughtfully deliver what you need.
As the Lents Neighborhood Association’s Educational Committee says,
“Slow Down. Listen. We’ll Help.”
Thank you,
Kelly McGrath
Parent
*****
Marshall’s Community Meeting will be on Thursday, May 27th from 6:30 – 8:30pm in the auditorium. Light snacks, childcare and translation services will be available.

5 comments
We, the Marshall Community, have been lied to. Again. Kelly, you bring it up in your wonderful letter — that we were told that if demand was there, that the focus school would NOT be capped at 500. Yet today, at the focus option planning meeting, we were told very clearly by Alan Dichter (Office of Focus School Support, which we apparently have…) that the cap would be firm at 400 — 100 per each grade level. And if the interest and demand were greater? “If 150 students apply for a grade level, only 100 will get in.” So, even if ALL our current students on Marshall Campus were to apply to be part of the new focus school — nearly half would be turned away. So much for Robb Cowie’s suggestion to parents on May 20th, and Superintendent Smith’s own comments to our students on April 27th.
None of Carole’s top management understands the complications of high school redesign, I am sorry to say. Robb Cowie is a nice guy and he just said whatever people want to hear. The sad part is that PPS just assumes that Marshall is taking it lying down. It is so obvious that they are going ahead with the planning of a focus option for Marshall. They forget that Carrie Adams exists. In my opinion, for the district to listen, the Marshall community needs to threaten lawsuits. OCR grievances are pretty easy to file. Check into this. It has worked for ESL.
Show Me, It’s going to take a lot more than one person to prevent Marshall’s closure. The thing is that it’s not just Marshall’s fight. People of color and people from low-income communities throughout PPS need to band together and demand change. We’ll never make any progress if everyone is only interested in their own school or group.
I think the District should take a look at what is going to happen at Roosevelt. For the next 2 years, there will still technically be 3 small schools. Kids will take all their core academic classes with same kids and the same teacher, thus building those important relationships. the bell schedules will be aligned and kids will be able to cross over for their electives, activities and sports. Seems like a nice hybrid of the small school and comprehensive models. From what I’ve been able to gather, this sounds like it would appeal to the Marshall community. I bet a lot of students out there would choose to come back to Marshall if PPS created this kind of model out there.
Leah, I taught at Lane Middle School for 10 years under this model (which were then called “houses”). It really worked pretty well. Kind of a combination of the small school, large school approach. (By the way we had nearly a 1000 students at one point.)
Leave a Comment